Pixelated Semantics |
|
|
June 28, 2004
According to Man of Steel explaining "the philosophy of the Liberal Party" is different to "explaining a new government policy" - as if the Liberals are somehow disconnected from being the current government, or their philosophy is quarantined from actual policies and decisions. Hence no need to pay back taxpayer's money used for current advertising that is found to be political, and the consequent labelling of the Labour intention as a "stunt". The attempted disconnection between policy and philosophy is a semantic stunt, like the government's penchant for answering different questions to those they were asked. For example, on accusations of hiding information on Abu Grahib abuse, the government's retort was to insist that no Australians were involved, despite that not being the assertion made by the questioner. The perception that our security services produce "intelligence assessments the Government wants to hear" is also played down, at the expense of the repution of messengers bringing information contrary to government policy, and in defiance of evidence of "systematic distortion" of facts in relation to WMD, refugees, East Timor, Bali, and many other critical electoral issues. Repackaging policies and announcements is also popular, for example, last week's schools funding "initiative" and the conditions attached were originally announced in March, the government has simply repackaged them to appear new, adding the flagpole condition as a populist addon.
Comments:
Post a Comment
| HOME | EMAIL | Root Blog | Bloggerfind |
Newshounds | Blogion | Thought Criminals | Blog Search Engine | Blogarama | Blogwise | Blog Pulse | Blog Shares | Wilson's Blogmanac | Unspeak | Browning Mummery Blog | |